tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819270169763743770.post9181376651019887287..comments2023-07-06T06:23:14.631-07:00Comments on The Portfolio Investor: When to pass judgement.Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819270169763743770.post-72599660881139994572012-07-16T09:08:58.262-07:002012-07-16T09:08:58.262-07:00Yeah, I don't disagree with the principles you...Yeah, I don't disagree with the principles you mention there. I like the "No profit, no fee" idea. To be fair, some do extend subs to cover periods where no profit is made.<br /><br />And you're right too in the sense that if I could identify my own profitable angles and establish an edge for myself, I probably wouldn't pay for the expertise of others. Well, not so much, anyway - I'd always be prepared to pay for the best in the market and see it as an addition to what I was doing. What makes the best? Well, that of course is very subjective, but a number of years of consistent profit making would be a start!<br /><br />Cheers now,<br /><br />RowanTPIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08267151875715791707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-819270169763743770.post-89505368701536758122012-07-14T06:32:33.077-07:002012-07-14T06:32:33.077-07:00its that chap again :)
ok the 100 bets p/l debate...its that chap again :)<br /><br />ok the 100 bets p/l debate.this is my way of thinking:-<br />a member of a sevice pays a fee to receive betting recommendations because he/she is unwilling to invest their time identifying winning strategies.why else pay?<br />if the service is unable to turn a reasonable profit (min 15% footy , 30% horseracing) then fees should be returned.<br />what seems to be ignored or at least underplayed is the very real fact that subscribers are gambling on the providers ability to turn a decent profit.seems very strange to me that one has to pay for the privilege of gambling.a more equitable arrangement would be to offer a no profit no fee approach.this would demonstrate the provider had supreme confidence in his/her ability.<br />im afraid someone who actually losses money on top of the fees charge in one year out of five is totally unacceptable to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com